George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead
George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead
From: Madman Entertainment
Rated R16
95 minutes
Starring: Michelle Morgan, Josh Close, Shawn Roberts, Amy Lalonde, Joe Dinicol, Scott Wentworth, Philip Riccio, Chris Violette, Tatiana Maslany
Whether it be in film or in games, zombies have been given a fair bit of publicity in the last few years with the likes of 28 Days/Weeks Later, Shaun of the Dead, Dead Rising and Left4Dead.
Traditionally, zombies have been mindless, slow moving bodies who, although terrifying, seemed flawed due to the fact that if you kept away from them, didn’t get cornered and had enough weaponry, you could live to tell the tale. But that ideology was challenged in recent times by the notion that because zombies feel no pain then they should be able to push their bodies beyond what they could when they were living and feeling. Enter the fast running, super strength, single minded and semi intelligent zombies from films such as 28 Days Later. Enter a whole new era of undead terror. Romero, however, sticks to the old-school waddling zombies intent on feasting n your brains even if it takes them half an hour to walk up the driveway to do so.
George A. Romero is widely considered the father of zombie movies (well to be fair, none of his non-horror flicks have been anything to write home about), having made Night of the Living Dead (1968), Dawn of the Dead (1978), Day of the Dead (1985) and Land of the Dead (2005) – all epic films within their genre, the original being the standard that all others strive to attain. It would seem that about every decade or so, Romero makes another addition to the “of the Dead” family and perhaps, with the recent release of Diary of The Dead, only a matter of 3-4 years after the successful Land of the Dead, he should have stuck to that tradition.
Diary of the Dead tries too hard to deliver cutting social commentary while dishing out gore mixed with typical moments of black humour. It definitely achieves the humour – but probably not where it was intended. It’s easier to laugh at Diary of the Dead than with it.
The movie follows a group of film students making, ironically enough, a zombie movie of sorts out in the middle of nowhere. When news reports start coming in about the dead mysteriously coming back to life and attacking the living, the group decide to abandon the film shoot and travel back across the country to be with their families. Jason Creed (Joshua Close) whose film project it was, decides to document the groups’ reactions to what is happening as they go from cautious disbelief to an all-out panic for their own survival as they start to experience the phenomenon first hand.
Much of the film uses the handheld camera technique and has a first-person viewpoint – think Blair Witch and Cloverfield, but nowhere near as annoying as the former and nowhere near as stylish as the latter. As another camera gets found, and later on a third we are subjected to different viewpoints, but every now and then Romero cuts to a more traditional camera view to take in a third person perspective and expects the viewer to accept it as being authentic. No doubt Romero is always aiming for “edgy”, but Diary of the Dead comes across about as amateur as the film students it portrays.
Speaking of the characters themselves, I had a difficult time relating to any of them. There’s barely a likeable character amongst them, ranging from moody, ditzy, hedonistic and naïve to dispassionate and completely insensitive. The only character whom I thought might give the cast some substance is the students’ film tutor whom I kept expecting to step-up and take some kind of leadership role. Alas he’s a hopeless alcoholic whose only purpose is some light comic relief. This is emphasised when he chooses a longbow as his weapon of choice due to its “poetic” nature over a variety of ballistic weapons.
This, along with some cringe-worthy plot holes. Firstly that a group of film students making a zombie movie, obviously fans of the genre, never even mention the word “zombie” as the dead start rising around them. But the biggest “OH COME ON!!” moment, which ruins any kind of credibility to the film’s ending, hints that Romero’s heart just wasn’t in Diary of the Dead as much as his previous efforts. In fact I can picture him halfway through production giving a classic face-palm pose and thinking “Shit, I’ve started this, now I’m going to have to finish it”.
Ultimately, George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead only half achieves what it sets out to. Supposedly a commentary on the YouTube generation, it doesn’t display the technical knowledge to earn the respect of the YouTube generation. Supposedly an edge of your seat survival horror, but too slow-paced to create anything more than a general uneasiness.
Diehard zombie fans should check out Diary of the Dead if just to chalk up another title, but diehard George A. Romero fans will probably get more out of the Special Features than the film itself. Had it been made by an understudy or as a kind of homage to Romero from someone else then Diary of the Dead would hold some spiritual meaning to dedicated fans. But instead, it’s an also-ran and not worthy of the great man’s zombie portfolio.
Special Features:
• Master of the Dead – Interview with George A. Romero
• Speak of the Dead – George A. Romero’s career and his influences
• Into the Camera – Meet the cast in the film
• You Look Dead – A documentary on the make-up effects
• A New Spin on Death – A look into the visual effects of the film
• A World Gone Mad – Cinematography and design of the film
• Character Confessionals – Never before seen character footage
• Familiar Voices – Famous voices used in the background
• The Roots – Another interview with Romero
• The First Week – A filmmakers look through the 1st week of production
• Original Trailer
• Stills Gallery
Watch the trailer:











